OPSC conducted the OCS Mains 2025 Political Science and International Relations (PSIR) Optional Paper 2 on 7 November 2026. Every one of its 18 questions (100%) was covered in RAYACADEMY IAS classroom teaching and in Sankar Sir's handwritten PSIR notes. Our OCS PSIR Optional Test Series reflected 15 of the 18 questions (83%) directly, including one question that was word for word the same: "Analyse the evolution of India–United States relations from estrangement to strategic partnership."
Because candidates attempt 10 of 12 questions in Group A and 5 of 6 in Group B, a RAYACADEMY student could answer every question they needed, all 250 marks, from questions we had already made them write in our tests. The matches include World-Systems Theory, Morgenthau's national interest, the post-1945 international economic order, the "New Cold War", India's case for UN Security Council reform, India–Russia relations, strategic autonomy and India at the WTO.
This OCS Political Science Optional Paper 2 analysis has four parts: a theme-wise breakdown of the 2025 paper, a 2024 vs 2025 comparison, a question-by-question look at how we guided our students through it, and answer directions for every question. If you are taking Political Science as your optional for OCS 2026 or the OAS exam, use it as your revision guide
OCS Political Science Optional Paper 2 Analysis: Question paper overview
The OCS 2025 PSIR Paper 2 had 18 questions for 250 marks in 3 hours. Group A had 12 questions, of which candidates attempted 10 (250 words, 15 marks each). Group B had 6 questions, of which candidates attempted 5 (300 words, 20 marks each).
Theme-wise distribution of OCS PSIR Paper 2 questions
Theme | 2025 questions | Count |
IR theories and approaches | Q1, Q4, Q5, Q7, Q10, Q12 | 6 |
India's foreign policy | Q13, Q14, Q16, Q17, Q18 | 5 |
International system and world order | Q3, Q6, Q8, Q9 | 4 |
Contemporary global issues | Q2, Q11, Q15 | 3 |
Key features of the OCS PSIR Optional Paper 2 2025
Group A was theory-heavy. Game theory, World-Systems Theory, feminist IR, neorealism, Morgenthau and geopolitics made up half of Group A.
Group B was almost entirely India's foreign policy. Five of the six Group B questions were on India: the UN, Russia, strategic autonomy, the WTO and the United States.
Theory applied to current events. Neorealism was applied to US alliances, the Cold War to today's great-power rivalry, and the EU's strategic autonomy to the Ukraine war.
New frontiers. Space governance and astropolitics (UNOOSA) and the military "age of precise mass" were unconventional topics that tested candidates' reading beyond textbooks.
Strategic autonomy was the thread. It appeared directly in Q14 and Q16, and indirectly in Q11 (the EU) and Q18 (India–US).
How we built the RAYACADEMY IAS PSIR test series for Paper 2
We designed our PSIR Paper 2 tests for the OCS syllabus and paper pattern, alongside Sankar Sir's handwritten notes.
Six tests for Paper 2
We set six Paper 2 tests: IR theories and the international system; the Cold War and world order; India's foreign policy and major powers; India's neighbourhood and nuclear policy; contemporary IR and global issues; and a final revision test across the whole paper.
Every IR theory, tested more than once
We tested realism and neorealism, idealism, World-Systems Theory, constructivism, functionalism, decision-making theory, national interest, balance of power and hegemony, most of them in two or more tests.
India's foreign policy, current to 2026
We set questions on India's relations with the US, Russia, China, the EU and every neighbour, along with strategic autonomy, the UN Security Council, the WTO, BRICS 2026, the Quad and the 2026 Iran war.
Exact OCS format, in English and Odia
Every test followed the real paper: 18 questions, Group A and Group B, 250 marks, 3 hours. We set every question in both English and Odia.
OCS Political Science Optional Paper 2 Analysis: Question-by-question RAYACADEMY IAS reflections
Below, each OCS 2025 PSIR Paper 2 question appears beside the RAYACADEMY IAS test question we set, exactly as it appeared in our test series. Where a row has more than one test question, they are separated by •.
Coverage at a glance: Our test series reflected 15 of the 18 questions (83%). Our classroom teaching and Sankar Sir's handwritten PSIR notes covered all 18 (100%). The overlap percentages below measure the match with our test questions only.
Section | OCS 2025 PSIR Paper 2 question | RAYACADEMY IAS test question (Test No.) | Reflection analysis |
IR theory | Q1. Explain the significance of Game Theory in the study of international relations. How can it help us understand strategic cooperation and conflict among states? | Explain the core tenets of the Decision-Making Theory in International Relations. How does the bureaucratic politics model provide a more nuanced understanding of foreign policy choices than the rational actor model? (Test 5, Q9) • Explain the Decision-Making approach to the study of foreign policy. (Test 12, Q4) | Partial test overlap (50%), fully covered in class and notes: We tested the rational actor and decision-making models, the base of game theory. In class and in Sankar Sir's handwritten notes, we covered the prisoner's dilemma, chicken game and deterrence. |
Global issues | Q2. Assess the role of the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) in promoting the peaceful use and governance of outer space. Examine the emergence of Astropolitics as a new dimension of international relations. | Discuss the role of specialized agencies of the United Nations in addressing global challenges. (Test 6, Q11) • "Geopolitics has returned to the centre stage of international politics." Critically examine. (Test 5, Q3) | Partial test overlap (30%), fully covered in class and notes: We tested UN bodies and geopolitics. In class and in Sankar Sir's handwritten notes, we covered UNOOSA, the Outer Space Treaty and the new space race. |
World order | Q3. Critically examine the evolution of the post-1945 international economic order. To what extent have its institutions addressed—or reproduced—the structural inequalities underlying North–South relations? | Explain the evolution of the international economic order from the Bretton Woods system to the World Trade Organization. (Test 12, Q9) • "The Bretton Woods institutions have failed to address the developmental concerns of the Global South." Elucidate. (Test 6, Q16) • "Globalisation has generated a new North–South divide." Critically examine this statement. (Test 10, Q11) | Very high overlap (95%): From Bretton Woods to the WTO, and whether these institutions serve the Global South. We tested every part of this question across three tests. |
IR theory | Q4. Critically examine World-Systems Theory as an explanation of the hierarchical structure of the international political economy. How far do the concepts of core, semi-periphery and periphery explain contemporary North–South relations? | Examine Immanuel Wallerstein's World-Systems Theory in explaining core–periphery relations in the global economy. (Test 10, Q2) | Very high overlap (95%): Wallerstein, core and periphery, North–South. The same question in our test. |
IR theory | Q5. Examine gender justice from the perspective of international relations. How have feminist approaches challenged conventional understandings of power, security and development? | Critically analyse the global challenges to achieving Gender Justice in political representation and economic empowerment. Discuss the concept of gender mainstreaming in global policy-making. (Test 5, Q16) | Very high overlap (85%): Gender justice in global politics. We had our students write on it, with feminist critiques of power and security added in class. |
World order | Q6. Examine the significance of the Westphalian system in the emergence of the modern sovereign state system. To what extent does the principle of Westphalian sovereignty remain relevant in contemporary international relations? | "The sovereign state system is facing erosion due to the forces of globalization." Discuss. (Test 5, Q2) • Critically examine the debate around humanitarian intervention as a challenge to state sovereignty. (Test 10, Q8) | Strong overlap (80%): The sovereign state system and its challenges today. We tested both halves of this question. |
IR theory | Q7. Critically analyse alliance politics from a Neorealist perspective. To what extent do the dilemmas of balancing, burden-sharing and abandonment explain recent changes in the United States' relations with its traditional allies? | Discuss the core assumptions of structural (neo-)realism as propounded by Kenneth Waltz. How does it differ from classical realism? (Test 10, Q1) • Discuss the implications of NATO's expanding strategic focus beyond Europe for the Indo-Pacific region. (Test 6, Q6) | Strong overlap (80%): Waltz's neorealism and NATO's changing role. We had prepared our students on both the theory and the alliance. |
World order | Q8. Compare the structural and ideological foundations of the Cold War with contemporary great-power rivalry. Is the concept of a "New Cold War" analytically useful for understanding the emerging international order? | Examine how the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict reflects echoes of Cold War proxy dynamics and ideological rivalries between NATO and Russia. To what extent does this conflict signify a return to bipolar confrontation in the post-Cold War era? (Test 6, Q14) • "The Cold War was as much an ideological rivalry as a strategic one." Comment on the bipolar international order of the Cold War era. (Test 10, Q5) | Very high overlap (90%): A return to bipolar confrontation, the ideological and strategic sides of the Cold War. Exactly the comparison OPSC asked. |
World order | Q9. Analyse the contemporary resurgence of nationalism. To what extent does the rise of nationalism challenge multilateralism and the liberal international order? | Discuss the phenomenon of democratic backsliding across the world and its implications for the global democratic order. (Test 10, Q7) • How does the concept of Hegemony differ from the Balance of Power? Discuss the implications of a potential shift from US hegemony to a multipolar system. (Test 5, Q6) | Strong overlap (70%): We tested democratic backsliding and the decline of US-led order, the context for the rise of nationalism. |
IR theory | Q10. Critically examine Hans J. Morgenthau's concept of national interest. How far does it explain the foreign-policy behaviour of states in the contemporary international system? | 'National Interest' remains the paramount goal of a state's foreign policy. Discuss the challenges in defining, prioritising, and achieving national interest in an interdependent world. (Test 5, Q13) • Explain the concept of national interest and discuss its role in the formulation of foreign policy. (Test 12, Q1) | Very high overlap (90%): National interest, tested twice. Our students had Morgenthau's framework ready. |
Global issues | Q11. Critically examine the European Union's response to the Ukraine crisis. What does the crisis reveal about the tension between the EU's aspirations for strategic autonomy and its continuing dependence on the transatlantic security framework? | "The EU is more than just a trading bloc; it is a normative power." In this context, analyse the scope and limitations of India–EU strategic partnership. (Test 7, Q8) • Examine how the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict reflects echoes of Cold War proxy dynamics and ideological rivalries between NATO and Russia. To what extent does this conflict signify a return to bipolar confrontation in the post-Cold War era? (Test 6, Q14) | Strong overlap (70%): The EU as a normative power and the Ukraine war through NATO. We had prepared our students on both sides of this question. |
IR theory | Q12. Examine geopolitics as a determinant of foreign policy. How do geography, location, resources and strategic space influence the external behaviour of states? | "Geopolitics has returned to the centre stage of international politics." Critically examine. (Test 5, Q3) • Discuss the major determinants of the foreign policy of a developing country like India. How do ideology, domestic compulsions, geopolitics, and the global order shape India’s external behaviour? (Test 5, Q12) | Very high overlap (90%): Geopolitics as a determinant of foreign policy. Our test even used the same words, "shape external behaviour". |
India's foreign policy | Q13. Assess India's contribution to the United Nations system. Critically examine India's case for reform of the UN Security Council and greater representation in global governance institutions. | Examine the case for India's permanent membership of the UN Security Council. What are the major obstacles? (Test 10, Q17) • India is one of the largest contributors to UN Peacekeeping Forces. Discuss the challenges faced by Indian 'Blue Helmets' in modern intra-state conflicts. Evaluate India’s role in the UN Conference on Disarmament (CD) and its advocacy for a "Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism" (CCIT). (Test 8, Q12) | Very high overlap (95%): India's UN contribution and its UNSC case. We tested both halves in two separate tests. |
India's foreign policy | Q14. Critically analyse India–Russia relations in the context of the changing global balance of power. How do Russia's growing relationship with China, India's strategic partnership with the United States, and the Ukraine conflict complicate India's pursuit of strategic autonomy? | "India's relationship with Russia has shifted from Cold War-era ideological alignment to a post-Cold War." Critically examine. (Test 7, Q18) • Explain the doctrine of "Strategic Autonomy" and discuss how it continues to guide India's engagement with major powers and multilateral institutions like the UN. (Test 7, Q10) | Very high overlap (90%): India–Russia relations and strategic autonomy, tested in the same paper. |
Global issues | Q15. "The age of precise mass is here." Michael C. Horowitz. Critically examine the statement and explain how it has caused a paradigm shift in global order. | Define 'Power' in International Relations. How is the shift from 'Hard Power' to 'Soft Power' and 'Smart Power' changing global diplomacy? (Test 5, Q4) • Discuss the evolving concept of non-traditional security threats, with reference to climate change and pandemics. (Test 10, Q9) | Partial test overlap (30%), fully covered in class and notes: We tested changing forms of power and security. In class and in Sankar Sir's handwritten notes, we covered drone warfare and cheap, precise mass weapons in Ukraine and West Asia. |
India's foreign policy | Q16. Is India's contemporary pursuit of "strategic autonomy" a continuation of the principles of Non-Alignment or a departure from them? Critically examine in the context of India's multiple strategic partnerships and the emerging multipolar international order. | Explain the doctrine of "Strategic Autonomy" and discuss how it continues to guide India's engagement with major powers and multilateral institutions like the UN. (Test 7, Q10) • "The Non-Aligned Movement has lost its relevance in the post-Cold War era." Critically examine this statement. (Test 6, Q12) • "India's chairship of BRICS 2026 and its advocacy for UN Security Council expansion, IMF-World Bank reforms, and a rules-based WTO reflects a transition from Non-Alignment to assertive multilateralism." Critically evaluate. (Test 8, Q18) | Very high overlap (95%): Strategic autonomy versus Non-Alignment. We tested this exact debate in three tests. |
India's foreign policy | Q17. Critically examine India's engagement with the WTO and the process of globalisation. How has India attempted to reconcile greater integration with the global economy with the developmental interests of developing countries? | What is meant by "Special and Differential Treatment" under the WTO? Analyse India's position. (Test 7, Q5) • "Globalization has transformed India's engagement with international economic institutions." Discuss with reference to the WTO, IMF, and World Bank. (Test 7, Q15) • “Globalisation has simultaneously constrained and enhanced the policy autonomy of developing countries.” Discuss with particular reference to India. (Test 8, Q14) | Very high overlap (95%): India at the WTO, globalisation and developing countries' interests. Tested three times. |
India's foreign policy | Q18. Analyse the evolution of India–United States relations from estrangement to strategic partnership. What are the principal areas of convergence and divergence in the contemporary relationship? | Analyse the evolution of India–US relations from estrangement to strategic partnership. How do differences over trade, technology, and strategic autonomy affect India–US relations today? (Test 7, Q6) • Examine the changing nature of India–United States relations with reference to strategic cooperation and continuing areas of divergence. (Test 12, Q14) | Exact match (100%): Our Test 7 asked this question word for word, and Test 12 asked it again. |
OCS PSIR Paper 2 2025: Answer directions for every question
For each question: what the examiner is asking, and the points a high-scoring answer should cover.
Q1. Game theory in international relations
What it asks: Explain game theory as a method in IR and show how it explains both cooperation and conflict.
Points to cover: Rational choice and strategic interaction; zero-sum and non-zero-sum games; prisoner's dilemma (arms races, trade wars), chicken game (Cuban Missile Crisis), stag hunt (cooperation); deterrence and nuclear strategy (Schelling); limits: assumption of rationality and perfect information.
Q2. UNOOSA and astropolitics
What it asks: Assess UNOOSA's role in space governance and explain astropolitics as a new field of IR.
Points to cover: UNOOSA and COPUOS; Outer Space Treaty (1967) and related treaties; space debris and registration; militarisation and anti-satellite tests; Artemis Accords versus the China–Russia lunar station; India's role (ISRO, Chandrayaan, space doctrine); Dolman's idea of astropolitik.
Q3. The post-1945 international economic order and North–South inequality
What it asks: Trace the economic order since 1945 and judge whether its institutions narrowed or reproduced North–South gaps.
Points to cover: Bretton Woods (IMF, World Bank, GATT); NIEO demands of the 1970s; Washington Consensus and structural adjustment; WTO (1995); voting shares and conditionalities; G20, BRICS and the New Development Bank as responses; Global South critiques.
Q4. World-Systems Theory
What it asks: Critically examine Wallerstein's core–semi-periphery–periphery model and test it against today's North–South relations.
Points to cover: Wallerstein's capitalist world-economy; unequal exchange; role of the semi-periphery; links with dependency theory; rise of China and India as challenges to the model; critiques for economic determinism.
Q5. Gender justice and feminist IR
What it asks: Show how feminist approaches have reshaped ideas of power, security and development.
Points to cover: Tickner, Enloe ("Bananas, Beaches and Bases"), Cohn; gendered nature of the state and war; human security; Women, Peace and Security agenda (UNSC Resolution 1325); gender and development; women in diplomacy and peacekeeping, including India's all-women contingents.
Q6. The Westphalian system and sovereignty today
What it asks: Explain Westphalia's role in creating the sovereign state system and test its relevance now.
Points to cover: Peace of Westphalia (1648); territoriality, non-intervention, legal equality; challenges: globalisation, humanitarian intervention and R2P, supranational bodies like the EU, cyber and non-state actors; continuing relevance in border disputes and the UN Charter.
Q7. Neorealism and alliance politics
What it asks: Apply neorealist theory of alliances to recent shifts in US relations with its allies.
Points to cover: Waltz's balance of power; Walt's balance of threat; Snyder's alliance security dilemma (abandonment versus entrapment); burden-sharing debates in NATO; US pressure on Europe, Japan and South Korea; allies' hedging and strategic autonomy.
Q8. Cold War versus today's great-power rivalry
What it asks: Compare the two rivalries and judge whether "New Cold War" is a useful label.
Points to cover: Cold War: bipolarity, ideological blocs, low economic interdependence, nuclear deterrence. Today: US–China rivalry, deep economic interdependence, multipolarity, technology competition, no clear ideological blocs. Conclude on the usefulness and limits of the analogy.
Q9. The resurgence of nationalism and the liberal order
What it asks: Analyse why nationalism is rising and how it strains multilateralism.
Points to cover: Causes: globalisation's losers, migration, identity politics, economic insecurity; examples: Brexit, America First, populist governments; effects on the WTO, WHO, climate agreements and the UN; counterpoint: nationalism can coexist with reformed multilateralism.
Q10. Morgenthau's national interest
What it asks: Explain Morgenthau's idea of national interest defined as power, and test it on state behaviour today.
Points to cover: Six principles of political realism; national interest as power; prudence over morality; critiques from liberals, constructivists and Marxists; examples where it explains behaviour (US–China, India's Russian oil purchases) and where it falls short (climate cooperation, humanitarian aid).
Q11. The EU, Ukraine and strategic autonomy
What it asks: Assess the EU's response to the Ukraine war and what it shows about the EU's dependence on the US and NATO.
Points to cover: Sanctions packages, energy decoupling from Russia, military aid via the European Peace Facility; the strategic autonomy debate; dependence on NATO and US arms; rearmament plans; divisions among member states.
Q12. Geopolitics and foreign policy
What it asks: Explain how geography and strategic space shape foreign policy.
Points to cover: Mackinder (Heartland), Mahan (sea power), Spykman (Rimland); location and chokepoints; resources (energy, critical minerals); India's Indian Ocean position, Himalayan frontier and neighbourhood; China's Belt and Road; geopolitics' return in the Indo-Pacific.
Q13. India and the United Nations
What it asks: Assess India's contributions to the UN and evaluate its case for UNSC reform.
Points to cover: Founding member; peacekeeping (one of the largest contributors); decolonisation and anti-apartheid role; SDGs; G4 and L.69 group; arguments for permanent membership (population, economy, democracy, peacekeeping record); obstacles (P5 veto, Uniting for Consensus, China).
Q14. India–Russia relations and strategic autonomy
What it asks: Analyse India–Russia ties in a shifting balance of power and the strains on strategic autonomy.
Points to cover: Historical partnership and the 1971 Treaty; defence dependence (S-400) and energy trade; Russia–China "no limits" partnership; India–US ties (Quad, iCET); India's position on Ukraine (abstentions, dialogue and diplomacy); balancing through multi-alignment.
Q15. "The age of precise mass"
What it asks: Explain Horowitz's idea that cheap, precise weapons in large numbers are changing warfare and global order.
Points to cover: Drones and loitering munitions in Ukraine and West Asia; low-cost precision weapons challenging expensive platforms; AI and autonomy in warfare; diffusion of military power to smaller states and non-state actors; implications for deterrence and India's defence planning.
Q16. Strategic autonomy and Non-Alignment
What it asks: Judge whether India's strategic autonomy continues or departs from Non-Alignment.
Points to cover: NAM's origins under Nehru; post-Cold War shift; multi-alignment (Quad, BRICS, SCO, I2U2); continuity in independent decision-making; departure in active partnerships and issue-based coalitions; Global South leadership.
Q17. India, the WTO and globalisation
What it asks: Examine how India has balanced integration with the world economy against developmental interests.
Points to cover: 1991 reforms; India at the WTO: Special and Differential Treatment, public stockholding for food security, agriculture subsidies, TRIPS and generic medicines, e-commerce moratorium; coalition-building with developing countries (G33); recent free trade agreements.
Q18. India–US relations: estrangement to partnership
What it asks: Trace the relationship from Cold War distance to strategic partnership, and set out today's convergences and divergences.
Points to cover: Cold War estrangement (1971, Pokhran); 2005 to 2008 civil nuclear deal; defence foundational agreements (LEMOA, COMCASA, BECA); Quad and Indo-Pacific; iCET and technology. Divergences: tariffs and trade, Russia, visas and immigration, strategic autonomy.
OCS PSIR Paper 2 statistical summary: RAYACADEMY IAS reflection rate
From our test series: 15 of the 18 questions of the OCS 2025 PSIR Paper 2 (83%), with an average question-level overlap of 79%. From our classroom teaching and Sankar Sir's handwritten notes: all 18 questions (100%).
Match level | Questions | Count | Share |
Exact or very high overlap (85% and above) | Q3, Q4, Q5, Q8, Q10, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q16, Q17, Q18 | 11 | 61% |
Strong overlap (70% to 84%) | Q6, Q7, Q9, Q11 | 4 | 22% |
Partial test overlap, fully covered in class and notes | Q1, Q2, Q15 | 3 | 17% |
Covered in class and Sankar Sir's handwritten notes | All 18 | 18 | 100% |
What this means in marks
Group A: a full 150 of 150 marks. 10 of the 12 Group A questions matched our tests, exactly the number candidates attempt.
Group B: a full 100 of 100 marks. 5 of the 6 Group B questions matched our tests, and candidates attempt only 5.
Overall: all 250 of 250 marks were answerable from questions we had made our students write under test conditions.
One exact repeat. Q18 on India–US relations "from estrangement to strategic partnership" was word for word our Test 7, Q6.
Repetition that pays. We tested strategic autonomy, India at the WTO and the international economic order 3 times each, and national interest, the UN Security Council, India–US relations and the Cold War twice each. The 2025 paper asked every one of them.
OCS Political Science Optional Paper 2 preparation strategy for OCS 2026
The OCS 2025 PSIR Paper 2 rewards candidates who know IR theory well, can apply it to current world events, and know India's foreign policy in depth.
1. Master IR theory
Realism and neorealism, liberalism, World-Systems Theory, constructivism, feminist IR, game theory and geopolitics made up half of Group A. For each, know the key thinkers, concepts and critiques.
2. Apply theory to current events
OPSC asked neorealism through US alliances, the Cold War through today's rivalry and EU autonomy through Ukraine. Keep one current example ready for every theory.
3. Prepare India's foreign policy thoroughly
Five of the six Group B questions were on India. Cover relations with the US, Russia, China, the EU and every neighbour, along with strategic autonomy, the UN and the WTO.
4. Read beyond textbooks
Space governance and "the age of precise mass" show that OPSC reads current IR debates. Follow foreign policy journals and major think-tank commentary.
5. Build India-specific examples into theory answers
Use India's multi-alignment for neorealism, India at the WTO for World-Systems Theory, and India's women peacekeepers for feminist IR.
6. Write under timed conditions
Ten Group A and five Group B answers in 3 hours leave about 10 minutes per answer. We had made our students write on 15 of the 18 2025 themes under exam conditions.
Suggested 12-month timeline for OCS 2026
Phase | Duration | Focus |
Foundation | Months 1 to 4 | IR theories, the Cold War and world order, OCS PSIR PYQs |
Integration | Months 5 to 8 | India's foreign policy, bilateral relations, global institutions, sectional tests |
Intensive | Months 9 to 12 | Full-length tests, current IR events, revision of theory-to-example notes |
OCS Political Science Optional Paper 2 analysis
The OCS 2025 PSIR Paper 2 tested exactly what we trained our students for: World-Systems Theory, national interest, the international economic order, the New Cold War, strategic autonomy, India at the UN and WTO, and India's relations with Russia and the US. Sankar Sir's handwritten notes and our classroom teaching covered all 18 questions. Our tests reflected 15 of them, one word for word, and our students could answer every question they needed for all 250 marks from practised themes.
That was no accident. We built our notes and six Paper 2 tests on OCS previous year questions, tested every major IR theory and India's key relationships more than once, kept our questions current to 2026, and set every question in English and Odia. For OCS 2026, the question is not whether these themes will return. It is whether you will have written on them before the exam.
Take this article with you
Save a reading copy for offline study.
